Here comes the challenge? Per NY Mag, Clinton campaign manager John Podesta has just met with a group of “prominent computer scientists and election lawyers” to discuss what they claim to be a “suspicious pattern of evidence” which may point to hacking an other manipulation in the swing states of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan. The Clinton camp has until Friday, Monday, and next Wednesday (respectively) to challenge the results in those states.
The academics presented findings showing that in Wisconsin, Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines compared with counties that used optical scanners and paper ballots. Based on this statistical analysis, Clinton may have been denied as many as 30,000 votes; she lost Wisconsin by 27,000. -NY Mag
This comes on the heels of both the Clinton camp and the White House repeatedly blaming Russian hackers for the Wikileaks dumps of the Podesta emails, Clinton emails, and DNC emails which led to utter chaos as bombshell after bombshell reigned down and shocked a nation. Exposed for all to see were rampant Clinton Foundation pay to play, occultism, the rape of Haiti and it’s child trafficker Hillary Clinton helped, #Pizzagate, Clinton’s deep Saudi ties, cheating during the primaries, and strange pedophilic and cannibalistic art at the Podesta residences. Also exposed were the slew of MSM media whores beholden to these silver tongued devils.
Keep in mind, this meeting between nerds, lawyers, and John Podesta doesn’t necessarily mean Clinton will issue challenges. Perhaps this story has been conspicuously placed in the public domain to justify electioneering down the road. Either way, pay attention on Friday, as it is the first deadline for a challenge.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
She better not do it. I wagered on the winner online and won. They’ll probably hold my money now….
Hah! Our township uses scanners/paper ballots and went 81% Trump, 17% Clinton. The entire county was over 3:1 Trump. All on scanners and paper. Just sayin…
Just saying HRC is up 2 million in popular vote so perhaps there were some shenanigans.. yes… a conspiracy to steal the election!
But I kind of like watching Trump.. he’s so fuckin crazy. Yes, he can run the country and his business at the same time. No law against it. Can’t make this shit up. He can co-president with Ivanka. Shortly you alt cucks will turn on him and the fun will start. He’s all yours.
In my opinion, the child trafficking BS is crazy tin-foil hat dumbass dipshit rightwing propaganda. That said, moving on: if the data scientists suggest a recount is worthwhile, then whatever man, the Democrats should feel free to knock themselves out. There are a host of systemic errors that could swing the election in those states in questions, without blaming the Russians, or this exercise will just validate Trump’s win. Folks recounted the hell out of Florida in 2000. I’m agnostic about the data.
@trader – have you heard of the Clinton Foundation? The bar for malfeasance is pretty high if you’re suggesting Trump is going to engage in similar conflicts of interest and/or direct bribery in exchange for political favors. We have proof of your candidate actually doing this, you have nothing more than scare mongering until proven otherwise.
@ginfizzbear, much of the child trafficking thing came directly from verified Wikileaks, and if it’s a tin-foil thing, there are a TON of coincidences that don’t look good. At minimum I think it needs to be seriously explored by authorities instead of shit being flung around the internet in every direction.
I’m with you on the recount. If they leave this thread open with the bullshit eggheads suggesting fraud, it’s going to leave lingering doubt for snarky fucks in turtlenecks to go on about.
The US will burn if they try to steal the election. The snowflakes currently protesting and others backing them will wish they hadn’t gone down this road. With that said, it set the stage for martial law. full disclosure .. I wear a turtleneck.
Wearing a turtleneck is like being strangled by a really weak guy, all day. Wearing a backpack and a turtleneck is like a weak midget trying to bring you down. -Mitch Hedberg
In the great state of Wisconsin, from which I took my first breath, a depraved loser democrat tossed out my presidential vote against Obama in 2012. I have proof.
I had just moved back to the promised land from Minnesota, so I had to register at the polls and hand in a special ballot to a troll of a lady that said she “would take care of it”.
Fast forward to just before the 2016 election, it turns out I was never a registered voter in Wisconsin. Imagine that. What I would give to have that lady’s name.
But, I’m not at all surprised, given their lack of moral fiber.