iBankCoin
Joined Nov 11, 2007
1,458 Blog Posts

$VIX Trades for 100 Days Below Its 200 Day Average: Bullish or Bearish?

I recently published a simple study which examined how SPY has performed after $VIX closed above its 200 day average. The flip side of that study is to examine how SPY has performed after $VIX has closed for X days beneath its 200 day average and then closes above it.

On June 1st, $VIX closed above its 200 day moving average after trading beneath it for 115 days. There are only six instances in the entire $VIX history where it has traded for more than 100 days beneath its 200 day moving average. Does the number of days it has traded beneath the 200dma have any discernible effect on SPY performance if SPY is bought at the close the day $VIX closes back above its 200dma?

The Rules:

Buy SPY at the close if

  • $VIX has closed beneath its 200dma for more than X days
  • $VIX closes above its 200dma

SPY is sold Y days later. No commissions or slippage included. All SPY and $VIX history used.

The Results:

The results show that we can expect more sideways trading and volatility. While the >99 days results are promising, there were only 5 trades. The dates and results for these 5 trades are below. Perhaps 20 years from now we will have enough samples to draw some conclusions, but for now, we must only observe and try not to make major decisions on the results generated from only 5 trades.

EntryDate      % Gain/Loss

SPY   8/3/1999     -3.21%
SPY    3/10/2004  -2.63%
SPY    2/27/2007   8.36%
SPY    1/22/2010    9.00%
SPY    6/1/2012       3.71%

The >24 days below results were generated from 30 trades. 25 trades were held the full 50 days. While this is not a large sample, I believe it is large enough for us to expect more volatility and sideways trading.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

6 comments

  1. TraderDR

    Wanted to say thanks for looking at that AAPL strategy, really appreciated your insight

    Awesome analysis as usual

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. TopTick

    Thanks, Wood!

    What would you think about using historical volatility instead of implied volatility (VIX)? That would be a way to get a lot more history. HV is not the same as IV, but is strongly correlated.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. Woodshedder

    Top, I sure could use HV. Is there a lookback period that you prefer?

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  4. echao

    ma(50) above ma(100) where to go in short term???

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"