Could Wall Street Love Obama More? Mon Oct 1, 2012 11:03am 21 My third hit from Yahoo Finance last week: OBAMA THE MAGIC PRESIDENT THAT MADE THE STOCK MARKET DOUBLE BRING ON THE HATE MAIL !! Tweet 21 Responses to “Could Wall Street Love Obama More?” Scott Bleier October 1, 2012 at 11:46 am I think my friends at the Racoon Lodge will be pissed at me… juice October 1, 2012 at 12:25 pm you and smacke are quite the duo even if the market hadn’t doubled, you failed to mention that romney plain sucks .. if he was even 1/2 decent, the polls would be close drummerboy October 1, 2012 at 1:47 pm get your coal plays lined up if 0zer0 loses.i can see aci doubling and tripling on any sign that he goes. you heard it here first kiddies……. Sur Platonic Plateau Du Tecnocrats, B.R.A., D.J.D. upon Rookness. October 1, 2012 at 4:00 pm Fundie wise, I concur. But coal keeps getting pushed around in in the final print… . Something’s gotta give. $SYNM!!! Stack October 4, 2012 at 9:52 pm Give the boy his due. This played out well today. Good call! random schmo October 1, 2012 at 1:49 pm Next Piece should be on how anti “alternative energy” .Bummer is. Look at any alternative form of energy and it’s price last 4 years. Coal? Solar? Nat Gas? LOL! oh yeah he’s “green” in terms of political experience, but in terms of energy, he’s about as green as red. hater October 1, 2012 at 2:19 pm I don’t really think it will take a whole lot for 1)Voter turnout to be significantly less than last election, particularly among young, former and current obama supporters that are currently over 50%unemployed, (or even those that have spent a significant amount of time unemployed or with most of their friends unemployed) 2)allegations, rumors of allegations, and actual scandals being uncovered in in the process of being investigated which could severely derail either candidate significantly impacting new poll numbers and of course the results. 3)Higher voter turnout among republicans… http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll Plus, the poll numbers aren’t really that far apart. Metalleg October 1, 2012 at 7:21 pm Did o-zero beat McCain in a landslide? O-zero was much more popular back then so anyone calling an o-zero win is delusional. FXTRADEX6 October 1, 2012 at 10:07 pm Polls are useless. Stick to monitoring political betting. people put their money where their vote is. hater October 1, 2012 at 2:25 pm And the debates will of course make a significant impact. http://www.2012presidentialelectionnews.com/2012-debate-schedule/2012-presidential-debate-schedule/ The thing about polls, is they can only say with a certain degree of confidence (dependent on sample size, margin of error, etc) if election were held and if the response was representative of the sample, and the sample is representative of the whole, who would win if the election was held the duration of when the poll was carried out… assuming poll takers are being honest and there aren’t biases which can drastically impact results of the sample. And, it is not the popular vote that matters, but the number of electoral delegates assigned. Nevertheless, the poll numbers don’t even show Obama beyond the 3% margin of error. Statistically you can’t even be 95% confident that IF all of the above were correct that Obama would win if election was held right now (before all the debates). So any talk of “who will win” particularly before the last few debates is very premature drummerboy October 1, 2012 at 3:12 pm fuck that chicago turd.call it, what it really will be. a race between black and white,because thats the way 0 rolls. just like that commercial with samuel L jackson,as he invades a white couples’ living room and tell them to wake the fuck up. were awake,but every 0zer0-phone will make it all black-vs-white, because they have already started,just watch the commercial.polls dont mean shit, the only thing your right about. sspiff October 1, 2012 at 3:12 pm How Dare you cast aspersions against Dear Leader 0bama. Your name will be entered in the rolls of the enemies of the people. drummerboy October 1, 2012 at 3:13 pm yea,but i hear wolfgang puck created the menu at the fema camps. fried chicken and watermelon on sundays. sspiff October 1, 2012 at 3:44 pm You may be sent to the peoples re-education camps with the rest of the reactionary capitalists. jg October 1, 2012 at 7:39 pm HAHAHAHAHA. Let me sum it up. Obie gives you higher stock prices and free stuff. Romney gives you lots of empty plans and most likely less free stuff. Hmmmmm. Common man have a tough dilemma. Oh and guess what, THEY WILL BOTH ULTIMATELY DO THE EXACT SAME THING! BWAHAHAAHAH drummerboy October 2, 2012 at 6:42 am zer0 didnt give higher stock prices.the clam did. and i’ll bet romneys’plan doesnt include every american as a terrorist like ghetto boy does.cass sunstein,bill aryes,and 0zer0 can all go fuck themselves.not only are they racist,they are treasonist racists. random schmo October 2, 2012 at 10:44 am India’s GDP 8.2% and China’s GDP 9.8%…. India’s interest rates? 5.75% China’s interest rates about 6% Unemployment India 8% and China 4% ——————————– Japan 0% interest rates, 0 inflation -.3% growth. True, Unemployment is only 5% but at what cost? UK -.5% interest rates -.6% GDP 4% inflation 8% unemployment Eurozone interest rates around 1%, GDP 0.3%,10% unemployment, 2.4% inflation high interest rates are good! Cascadian October 2, 2012 at 5:32 pm It’s so close to a tie the debates will be crucial. If Romney looks like an okay choice after the debates he will have a decent chance. There’s no tellin’ what 0bama will do if re-elected. He told the Russians he would have more lattitude after the election… so watch out! Stack October 4, 2012 at 10:00 pm Thats a fantastic point. Would love to see Romney blindside Obama at the last debate and ask him what he meant by that. mad_scientist October 2, 2012 at 11:59 pm Even if Romney destroys him in the debate, the media will declare obama the winner of the debate. And they will put up “instant polls” that supposedly show the viewer sentiment was that obama won. But they still can’t fool everyone. mad_scientist October 3, 2012 at 11:41 pm wow. even the liberal media cannot deny that ozero was crushed in this debate. The facts are on Romney’s side, and the facts got highlighted tonight. Comments are closed.