iBankCoin
I turn dials and fiddle with knobs to hone in on harmonic rotations
Joined Oct 26, 2011
4,121 Blog Posts

Pay To Play: AP Bombshell Reveals A State Department For Sale During Clinton Regime

The Associated Press obtained State Department calendars, and upon review they found most people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of State gave money to the Clinton Foundation.

WASHINGTON (AP) —At least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to a review of State Department calendars released so far to The Associated Press. Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million.

If a private sector civilian wanted to sit at the big girl table over in Washington, they had to grease the wheels at the Clinton Foundation.

Maybe the donation puts you on the books for some face time with Hillary, or perhaps it buys you a 10 minute phone call.  A charitable donation first, then a meeting, a bit more charity, and finally the State Department clears up the obstacle.

Now set the private sector aside.  Foreign countries had to buy in also:

Clinton met with representatives of at least 16 foreign governments that donated as much as $170 million to the Clinton charity, but they were not included in AP’s calculations because such meetings would presumably have been part of her diplomatic duties.

The Clinton Foundation took in nearly $200 million dollars from 16 foreign governments.  They presumably paid these fees for special access to State Department intelligence and access to key personnel inside the state.

One of the private meetings was with Muhammad Yunus, the Bangladeshi economist who pioneered micro-loans which are low-denomination loans given to extremely poor people in developing countries.  Said loans often carry usurious interest rates.

Muhammad Yunus, a Bangladeshi economist who won the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize for pioneering low-interest “microcredit” for poor business owners, met with Clinton three times and talked with her by phone during a period when Bangladeshi government authorities investigated his oversight of a nonprofit bank and ultimately pressured him to resign from the bank’s board. Throughout the process, he pleaded for help in messages routed to Clinton, and she ordered aides to find ways to assist him.

American affiliates of his nonprofit Grameen Bank had been working with the Clinton Foundation’s Clinton Global Initiative programs as early as 2005, pledging millions of dollars in microloans for the poor. Grameen America, the bank’s nonprofit U.S. flagship, which Yunus chairs, has given between $100,000 and $250,000 to the foundation — a figure that bank spokeswoman Becky Asch said reflects the institution’s annual fees to attend CGI meetings. Another Grameen arm chaired by Yunus, Grameen Research, has donated between $25,000 and $50,000.

As a U.S. senator from New York, Clinton, as well as then-Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry and two other senators in 2007 sponsored a bill to award a congressional gold medal to Yunus. He got one but not until 2010, a year after Obama awarded him a Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Yunus first met with Clinton in Washington in April 2009. That was followed six months later by an announcement by USAID, the State Department’s foreign aid arm, that it was partnering with the Grameen Foundation, a nonprofit charity run by Yunus, in a $162 million commitment to extend its microfinance concept abroad. USAID also began providing loans and grants to the Grameen Foundation, totaling $2.2 million over Clinton’s tenure.

By September 2009, Yunus began complaining to Clinton’s top aides about what he perceived as poor treatment by Bangladesh’s government. His bank was accused of financial mismanagement of Norwegian government aid money — a charge that Norway later dismissed as baseless. But Yunus told Melanne Verveer, a long-time Clinton aide who was an ambassador-at-large for global women’s issues, that Bangladesh officials refused to meet with him and asked the State Department for help in pressing his case.

“Please see if the issues of Grameen Bank can be raised in a friendly way,” he asked Verveer. Yunus sent “regards to H” and cited an upcoming Clinton Global Initiative event he planned to attend.

Clinton ordered an aide: “Give to EAP rep,” referring the problem to the agency’s top east Asia expert.

Yunus continued writing to Verveer as pressure mounted on his bank. In December 2010, responding to a news report that Bangladesh’s prime minister was urging an investigation of Grameen Bank, Clinton told Verveer that she wanted to discuss the matter with her East Asia expert “ASAP.”

Clinton called Yunus in March 2011 after the Bangladesh government opened an inquiry into his oversight of Grameen Bank. Yunus had told Verveer by email that “the situation does not allow me to leave the country.” By mid-May, the Bangladesh government had forced Yunus to step down from the bank’s board. Yunus sent Clinton a copy of his resignation letter. In a separate note to Verveer, Clinton wrote: “Sad indeed.”

Clinton met with Yunus a second time in Washington in August 2011 and again in the Bangladesh capital of Dhaka in May 2012. Clinton’s arrival in Bangladesh came after Bangladesh authorities moved to seize control of Grameen Bank’s effort to find new leaders. Speaking to a town hall audience, Clinton warned the Bangladesh government that “we do not want to see any action taken that would in any way undermine or interfere in the operations of the Grameen Bank.”

Hillary went to Bangladesh and dropped some strong-armed rhetoric at a town hall in their country.  It cost Yunus and his people about $300,000 to have the Secretary of State from USA endorse their bank.

There are more case studies in the full Associated Press report showing a similar link between donations to the Clinton foundation and preferential treatment by the state.  They call into question the ethics of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and the potential for corruption if she is elected.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

12 comments

  1. Juice

    If this was Trump, MSM would be drooling and tripping over themselves to demand his removal as a candidate. Now watch them try to bury the story.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. Traderconfessions
    Traderconfessions

    But Trump is still a Russian spy. His tax returns will reveal his duplicity. What is he hiding Raul?

    No bombshell that Hillary is a little oily around the edges. If she had an opponent that wasn’t a psycho she would likely lose. But that ain’t the case.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • zuul

      “I’m cool with a president that will very literally sell our democracy for her own benefit.”

      “That Trump guy though. Hoo boy. He built a business and stuff… FROM MONEY HE INHERITED!!!11@”

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • probucks

        +1

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • traderconfessions
        traderconfessions

        Trump is a Russian tool. Soooo anti-American. He hires foreigners and manufactures in China. He rips off hard-working Americans so he build golf courses in Scotland. He lip-locks Putin so he can build hotels in Russia. If elected, will he sell his company to avoid any potential conflict of interest? Should he reveal his tax returns so the American public can evaluate his business partners? Yes and yes if you love our country.

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. t.c.

    But it’s all for “charity” !!?? The Clintons make Trump look like Mr. Rogers. This corruption will bleed through the whole system by the time they are finished. Just like Obama’s social justice views make elementary school transgender bathrooms possible and enable cop killing.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • traderconfessions
      traderconfessions

      Yes! All for charity. Trump has clear ties to the Russian and US mob which will own his presidency. Can America risk this? NO!

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  4. boyaj

    I’m truly agnostic when it comes to the upcoming election, but I guess what constantly pulls at me is that Trump is a showman that says ridiculous, outlandish, and inappropriate things but any of his skeletons do not seem to stick and linger. However, Hillary to me tries to come off as honest, polished, and level-headed, yet her history and actions boarder/cross the line of legality. It comes down to motives: Trump’s motives do not seem to be hidden (whether you agree with them or not); Hillary’s motives have the stench of ulterior and stealth.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • zuul

      +1

      Good, objective take.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
    • traderconfessions
      traderconfessions

      American can’t have Russian stooge leading our country. Particularly one of particularly low character who cheats and steals from average Americans. Until he releases his taxes I can’t vote for him.

      • 0
      • 0
      • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
      • ottnott

        I get what you are doing, tc (“like fishing with no bait”), but they don’t get it. You are just convincing them that you are a knucklehead.

        Why waste parody on the unaware when you can just be factual?

        For example, you could have pointed out how ridiculous juice was being when his talked about the MSM burying the story. You don’t get more mainstream than the AP, and you don’t get less buried than a wire service story reprinted by its thousands of subscribers.

        You could have pointed out that the “pay” in Raul’s pay to play was funding programs to fight AIDS and gender-based violence, to assist survivors of sexual slavery, and to promote micro-scale business development in poor regions.

        You could have pointed out that the “play” in the phrase included more of the activities above, plus shocking benefits like participation in trade promotion and, the most obvious personal benefit of all, help with a visa matter.

        • 0
        • 0
        • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"