FLASH: GREEK 10 YEAR SOVEREIGN BONDS YIELDS FALL 47%

This is the DECK analyst, Sam Poser, so you should pay attention.

Lowering Rating from Buy to Neutral: Stock Through Our Price Target. Long Term Story Remains Intact

It reminds me of a Mortal Combat character.

Full article

“You say to Iran all options are on the table. Leave them there until they rot. The time of arrogance and colonialism has passed, and the era of your unreasonableness passes too.”

Full article

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0ALALQoodU&feature=player_embedded

RIP Mark.

The Mark Haines Bottom

They were forced to use CAC to complete deal.

Full article

Video

He looks to the international community instead.

Don’t tell investors.

This is the man Obama praised.

Video

h/t: @arnsummrs

Too funny.

CNN’s Soledad O’Brien’s venomously sarcastic interview with Breitbart.com editor-in-chief Joel Pollak culminated with her throwing out her definition of “Critical Race Theory” in the heat of her interview over the Obama/Bell Tapes released last night. Pollak had already requested that O’Brien define the term more than once, and at the 1:45 mark in the video below, she finally does. One problem–O’Brien’s definition appears to be lifted almost word-for-word from a wikipedia page, presumedly hurriedly communicated to Soledad in the midst of her interview.

A quick google search of O’Brien’s exact phrasing, in quotes, returns the Critical Race Theory wikipedia page as the first entry. Read and decide for yourself:

Soledad O’Brien: “Critical Race Theory looks into the intersection of race and politics and the law.”

Wikipedia entry on Critical Race Theory: “Critical Race Theory (CRT) is an academic discipline focused upon the intersection of race, law and power.”

O’Brien’s fumbling to come up with a response occurred when she attempted to challenge Pollak’s definition of critical race theory:

Soledad O’Brien: “That is a complete misreading of critical race theory. As you know, that’s an actual theory, and you could google it and someone would give you a good definition of it. So that’s not correct. So keep going.”

Joel Pollak: “In what way is it a critical misreading? Can you explain to me? Do you know what critical–Explain to your readers what critical race theory is.”

Soledad O’Brien: “I’m going to ask you to continue on. I’m just going to point out that that is inaccurate. Keep going.”

Pollak once again asked that she define it, at which point she inserted the wikipedia-esque response. See the video below.

Later in the video, O’Brien can be heard deflecting another question from Pollak, saying “You know what, someone was talking in my ear, so I couldn’t hear what you said.”

Source: Rebelpundit

Related: Video

This email just went out to ALL registered Keurig users.

TAKE THAT SBUX FUCKERS!!!

So funny.

Always funny.

Frontline just tossed a few hand grenades at Buzzfeed and Breitbart.

While BuzzFeed did not publish all of the available footage of the event — a manager here noted that they were paying for each second of footage — they did post the entirety of what was available of Obama’s speech. While other cameras could have shot additional material from the event, no other footage of the event exists at WGBH.

And while there does appear to be editing in the footage available, that was almost certainly done in 1990. The Ten O’Clock News practice was to store completed segments as aired along with any relevant additional footage that might be useful in the future.

Full Attack

Watch Obama Speaks at Harvard Law in ’90 on PBS. See more from FRONTLINE.