Link for iPhone users: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzT6X3_Bg9o
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
Link for iPhone users: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzT6X3_Bg9o
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
Zero cred.
The “Dr” is an honorary degree in theology from a religious school in North Carolina.
The “Nobel Prize Nominee” is a favored claim of con artists, because official lists of those nominated are not released for 50 years.
He once bought an ultralight plane and used it to run a flight school, but didn’t bother to register the plane or obtain liability insurance for the school – but told the instructors that the insurance was in place. At a govt tribunal regarding the failure, he acted like a nutcase and finally claimed ignorance about the basic procedures of the tribunal (a guide to which is provided to those scheduled to appear). This led the panel to postpone the remainder of the hearing to a later date to give Garrow time to bone up on the process. He blew off the rescheduled hearing and ignored all attempts to contact him.
http://www.tc.gc.ca/media/documents/ca-regserv/garrowa.doc
That behavior was consistent with the end of his teaching career in Canada, where he got a 9-month suspension for “professional misconduct”: “The allegations of professional misconduct against Garrow included failing to maintain the standards of the profession and abusing students physically, sexually, verbally, psychologically or emotionally.” The description of his behavior at the hearing is similar to that of his behavior at the tribunal: “His testimony was at times contradictory, inflammatory and irrelevant to the matters at issue, in contrast to the testimony from witnesses.”
http://professionallyspeaking.oct.ca/june_2002/blue13.asp
Fortunately for Garrow, the iBC News page maintains a credibility threshold low enough to permit passage even by creatures that leave a slime trail.
u tell’em bro!
cronk,wow, i cant believe this post. just yesterday,joe weasenthal put out about four paragraphs that didnt make all that much sense,but if you had read between the lines, and put some thought to it..well damn,you can come up with the exact same thought. is this guy actually asking our own armed services,that if he gave an order,to shoot to kill american ciitizens……… the people @B.I. who write these stupid assertions,only to gather a response from the completely unwashed. my response to mr.weaselthal was thumbed down by many,which tells me just how”caught off guard” these people will be when something like this happens.the very people that put him in are the ones that cant comprehend what this guy is gonna do.after all that video is living proof,that this guy wants his own army,separate from the one we already have.black panthers,and hispanic gang bangers.those are the ones that will shoot on american citizens!!!!! here take my guns please…….
drummerboy,
this is the second reference i have found in this matter. one was a document asking service men what their opinion was of the subject matter. 11% had no opinion while 25% had no problems with the order.
remember though if all this is actually true, then it will be for the most extreme scenarios like contingency plans for what happens after martial law is implemented for say a huge disaster like asteroid, complete financial meltdown, etc….
yes sir,but why should the thought ever be entertained to begin with,unless of course someone wants something to happen,other than a natural disaster.