iBankCoin
Home / 2012 / April (page 50)

Monthly Archives: April 2012

Finding the Next APPLE, $AAPL; $JPM Puts Out a List of 15 Possibles

“The 10-year return on Apple is  right around 5,000 percent.

That feeling you’re getting in your gut is regret.

You can’t take a time machine back to the ’90s and buy Apple.  But, you can invest in the stock that could become the next Apple.

“We have compiled a list of 15 ideas for companies that our analysts view as having secular growth opportunities, a strong market position, and attractive valuation, which make these equities attractive to own as the potential next ‘Apple,'” wrote JP Morgan’s Tom Lee in a recent note to clients.

“We compiled the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of AAPL.  Among them are: (i) products that inspire a following; (ii) reputational excellence; (iii) lifestyle products that focus on what one can do with their services/products; (iv) culture of success; and (v) prodigious growth offset by (vi) attractive valuations and (vii) ability to return capital.”

From Lee’s lengthy report, we pulled the key characteristics that make each of the 15 following companies something like Apple.

Source

Comments »

Best Buy’s, $BBY, CEO Dunn Calls it Quits

Best Buy Co. (BBY) said Chief Executive Officer Brian Dunn resigned and board member G. Mike Mikan is taking the position on an interim basis as the company focuses on smaller stores and Internet sales.

The change was a “mutual agreement” that new leadership was needed, the Richfield, Minnesota-based company said today in a statement. A committee of directors has been created to search for a new CEO, the company said.”

Full article

Comments »

Market Update

Source

“12:00 pm : The major market averages trade on session lows as sellers remain in control. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq lead today’s decline with losses of 1.1% while the Dow trades down 1.0%.

Shares of SuperValue (SVU 5.83, +0.514) are up 9.5% following the company’s better than expected fourth quarter earnings. The company announced earnings per share of $0.38 which topped Capital IQ Consensus Estimate of $0.36 per share. Revenues missed expectations, coming in at $8.23 billion on expectations of $8.32 billion.  DJ30 -123.82 NASDAQ -36.43 SP500 -15.66 NASDAQ Adv/Vol/Dec 461/714.5 mln/1948 NYSE Adv/Vol/Dec 474/305.2 mln/2508

11:30 am : The major averages hold near session lows as all three trade down 0.6%.

European financials are under significant selling pressure as peripheral yields continue to climb. Selling in the periphery has run the Italian and Spanish 10-yr yields up to 5.61% and 5.98% respectively while a flight to safety in German Bunds has produced record low yields for 2-, 5-, and 10-yr Bunds. Heavy buying dropped the 2-yr Bund yield to 0.100% as it slid below the 2-yr Japanese Government Bond yield for the first time ever. Numerous financial stocks are halted across Italy, and that is weighing on Barclays (BCS 13.26, -0.48), Deutsche Bank (DB 44.24, -0.74), andSociete Generale (SCGLY.PK 4.94, -0.23) are among the worst performing financials on their respective indices.DJ30 -74.70 NASDAQ -16.31 SP500 -8.35 NASDAQ Adv/Vol/Dec 578/558.2 mln/1793 NYSE Adv/Vol/Dec 584/243.3 mln/2340

11:00 am : The major averages fell to session lows as traders digested this morning’s wholesale inventories data. The Dow and S&P 500 lead the decline with losses of 0.5% while the Nasdaq sees slight outperformance with a 0.3% decline.

Best Buy (BBY 22.15, -0.50) is down 2.2% after the resignation of Chief Executive Officer Brian Dunn. The company has named Director Mike Mikan interim CEO until a permanent replacement is hired. Shares surged more than 4.0% in initial reaction to Mr. Dunn’s resignation, but have since rolled over as broad-based selling hit stocks following the wholesale inventories number.  DJ30 -70.80 NASDAQ -10.15 SP500 -6.76 NASDAQ Adv/Vol/Dec 690/438.3 mln/1633 NYSE Adv/Vol/Dec 734/194.0 mln/2138

10:35 am : In Energy, May crude oil sold off sharply from its recent session high of $102.99 to a new session low of $101.65/barrel. Crude is now -0.4% at $102.04/barrel.

May natural gas was near the unchanged line overnight. Natural gas found buyers around 7:30am ET and pushed into positive territory and a new session high of $2.12.This was short-lived and nat gas began to trend lower, dropping to a new session low of $2.07 and remains near that level, currently at $2.07, down 2%.

In metals, Apr gold and May silver have sold off in recent trade and dropped to new session lows (Gold $1634.30, Silver $31.26). In current activity, both precious metals remain near that level. Gold is now -0.4% at $1638.20, while silver is -0.6% at $31.33/oz.DJ30 -51.50 NASDAQ -5.73 SP500 -4.38 NASDAQ Adv/Vol/Dec 760/363 mlnl/1547 NYSE Adv/Vol/Dec 833/166 mln/1958

10:05 am : Monthly wholesale numbers were just released. They showed a 0.9% increase in February, and that’s more than the 0.5% increase that had been broadly expected. There hasn’t been any real reaction among stocks to the data. The Nasdaq continues to lead the way with a 0.1% gain while the S&P 500 and Dow hold just below their respective flat lines.DJ30 -21.23 NASDAQ +3.74 SP500 -1.26 NASDAQ Adv/Vol/Dec 1044/200.4 mln/1163 NYSE Adv/Vol/Dec 1099/106.9 mln/1639

09:45 am : The major market averages are mixed in early trade. The tech-heavy Nasdaq is holding a gain of 0.2% thanks in large part to the 0.9% jump in Apple (AAPL 642.20, +5.97). Meanwhile, the S&P is flat and the Dow is off 0.1%. Wholesale inventories will be released at 10 am ET.DJ30 -10.82 NASDAQ +6.57 SP500 +0.34 NASDAQ Vol 105.4 mln NYSE Vol 70.4 mln”

Comments »

Modest Hiring Gains Expected as March Sees A Slight Uptick in Job Openings

“WASHINGTON (AP) — Employers posted slightly more job openings in February, suggesting that modest hiring gains will continue in coming months.

The Labor Department said Tuesday that employers advertised 3.5 million job openings in February. That was a slight increase from a revised 3.48 million in January but still below the three-year high of 3.54 million in December.

The fact that job openings remained steady in February suggests that the disappointing March jobsreport issued last week could be a temporary bump. It usually takes one to three months for employers to fill openings.

Employers added 120,000 jobs in March — half the average from the previous three months. Theunemployment rate fell from 8.3 percent to 8.2 percent in March, though that was mostly because people gave up looking for work. People who are out of work but not looking for jobs aren’t counted among the unemployed.

Many economists downplayed the weak March figures, noting that a warmer winter may have led to some earlier hiring in January and February.

There is still heavy competition for each available opening. With 12.8 million people unemployed, there are on average 3.7 people out of work for each open position. That’s much better than the nearly 7-to-1 ratio that existed in July 2009, just after the recession ended. But it’s worse than the 2-to-1 ratio that is more common in a healthy economy.

Tuesday’s report, known as the Job Openings and Labor Turnover survey, or JOLTs, showed that more people quit their jobs and companies stepped up hiring in February…”

Read more

Comments »

73%–Just the Beginning for Obama

SOURCE

Buffett Rule tax just the start for Obama

By James Pethokoukis

April 10, 2012, 11:13 am

It won’t stop with the Buffett Rule, at least if President Barack Obama has his way. Making sure “no millionaire pays less than 30 percent of their income in taxes” — as the White House describes its proposal — would be just the beginning of radical remaking of the U.S. tax code.

Just how radical? Well, Team Obama drops a pretty big hint in the briefing document it produced about the Buffett Rule. In section V of the document — titled “The Economic Argument for the Buffett Rule — the report starts off immediately by favorably citing this piece of evidence:

In a recent paper, Nobel-Prize winning economic Peter Diamond and renowned tax economist Emmanuel Saez note the relatively greater ability of high income taxpayers to avoid taxes, and argue that “the natural policy response should be to close tax avoidance opportunities” (Journal of Economic Perspectives, Fall 2001).

Oh, but that Diamond-Saez study the White House likes so much — “The Case for a Progressive Tax:From Basic Research to Policy Recommendations” — says so much more.  In fact, what the study is best known for is its stunning conclusion — much talked about in liberal policymaking circles — that the “optimal tax rate” is “73 percent, substantially higher than the current 42.5 percent top U.S. marginal tax rate (combining all taxes).”

73%! The top U.S. tax rate hasn’t been that high since 1969. It was 70 percent when Ronald Reagan took office in 1981 and cut taxes across the board, helping launch a 25-year economic boom after the stagflation-ridden 1970s. (And other research by Saez suggest the top tax rate should be 83%, back where it was in the 1940s.)

But it is interesting to note, especially in light of the White House’s embrace of the Diamond-Saez research, that Obama himself doesn’t think too much of those Reagan tax cuts. As Obama wrote in The Audacity of Hope: “The high marginal tax rates that existed when Reagan took office may not have curbed incentives to work or invest … but they did lead to a wasteful industry of setting up tax shelters.”

So the only downside of 70% tax rate to Obama was excessive tax planning, not a huge disincentive to working, saving and investing?

Indeed, Obama made it clear in his Osawatomie, Kansas speech last December that America’s three-decade economic experiment in enhanced economic freedom—lower tax rates, less regulation, freer trade—has been a failure. Indeed, Obama said in that speech that although the “theory fits well on a bumper sticker … it has never worked.” Reagan and Clinton blew it. (Tax cutting JFK, too, apparently.) Time for a different formula. Time to raise taxes and create more rules for business with a goal of “shared prosperity and shared responsibility.”

But Operation: Reverse Reagan is already under way. In additional to cutting marginal tax rates, Reagan indexed tax brackets to inflation, stopping the automatic, inflation-induced tax hikes that were so notorious in the ’70s. But as AEIeconomist  Jim Capretta points out, the Obamacare tax hikes associated with Medicare — 0.9% on wages and 3.8% on non-wage income — are not indexed for inflation. While they will start out only hitting  high-income taxpayers ( individual with incomes exceeding $200,000 and couples with incomes above $250,000),  ever year they will affect more and more Americans, rich and middle-income alike. Bracket creep is back.

And don’t forget about the tax hike plans of liberal House members. Their recent “Budget for All” proposal would a0 allow the top-end Bush tax cuts to expire, b) create five new tax brackets — 45%, 46%, 47%, 48%, and 49% — for “millionaires and billionaires, c) slap a European-style wealth tax of 0.5% on fortunes of $10 million or more, d)  raise income taxes on the broad middle by allowing the “28% and 25% brackets to sunset once the economy is on solid footing, in 2017 and 2019, respectively.” That means higher taxes on families making over $70,000 a year.

The Buffett Rule? It would be just the beginning for Obama.

Comments »

Bob Janjuah: S&P At 800, Dow/Gold Ratio Will Hit 1 Before Next Real Bull Cycle

Source

“Bob Janjuah, who has been quiet lately (recall his last piece in which he quite honestly told everyone that “Markets Are So Rigged By Policy Makers That I Have No Meaningful Insights To Offer“), is out with his latest, in which he gives us not only his long-term preview, “ultimately I still fear and expect the S&P500 – as the global risk-on/risk-off proxy – to trade at 800, and the Dow/Gold ratio to hit parity (currently at 8, down from an all-time high of 45 in late 1999) before we can begin the next multi-decade bull cycle“, but also his checklist of 8 things to look forward to in the short-term centrally-planned future.

From Nomura’s Bob Janjuah

Please sir, can I have some more?

The current monetary policy settings in the US and Europe – which in my last note I dubbed monetary anarchy – continue to drive markets. While some may feel that central bank behaviour and experimental policies designed largely to boost markets is a good and desirable thing, I have little doubt that such ‘economic policies’ are already sowing the seeds of our next economic and markets malaise. I continue to believe strongly in the view that central bankers are intentionally mispricing the cost of capital, in an attempt to push the private sector to misallocate capital into consumption and into asset purchases at the wrong time and at the wrong price. Eras of such marked misallocations of capital normally end with bubbles that burst significantly. Central banks have shown us, time and again, that they are extremely good at driving bubble formation, that they are extremely good at denying their real motivations, and that they are extremely good at denying the existence of bubbles. History of course also shows us, over and over again, that bubbles are the direct consequence of central bankers mispricing capital, and history of course shows us that central bankers are largely impotent when it comes to preventing the significant bursting of said bubbles.

I think pump-and-dump policies, which have driven the Western cycles of print/borrow/consume over the last 20 years – and in particular over the last 10 years – are an undeniable economic failure. What is even more concerning to me is that, even after everything we have been through, the policymaker solution for our current sickness is more of the same – more debt, more liquidity, and more consumption! The West is in the midst of a multi-year era of declining living standards, in large part as a direct consequence of central bankers and their bubble blowing machines. I think sometimes those focused on markets and how to make the next buck out of the Fed/ECB ‘put’ should remember that, for example, it is at least in some part as a direct consequence of the Greenspan and then the Bernanke policy ‘puts’ that tens of millions of American citizens are either homeless and/or on food stamps. When the current post-2008/09 bubbles burst, central bank ‘puts’ and the arrogance we perceive that still persists in some parts of the financial sector will hopefully be consigned to the deep freeze box for a very long time.

Moving onto the more tangible near term:

1 – The extremely bullish seasonal and weather factors that in my view have artificially boosted (US) data over the 3-4 months to end-March are now over, and over the next 3-4 months are I feel instead going to be a material drag. It has already started, and by late Q2/early Q3 the eco bulls will I feel, once again, be left scratching their heads. For 2012, trend growth in the US will, in my opinion, be closer to 1.5% than 2.5%.

2 – The US consumer is in a weak and vulnerable position. Savings have been run down, to worryingly low levels, house prices are still falling, but the jobs picture is already turning down and gasoline prices are up nearly 20% from the December lows – and rising.

3 – The earnings season, which is about to start, will in my view be average at best – and this is merely a continuation of an already weakening trend, where weakness is actually quite significant outside of a very small single handful of individual companies.

4 – Now that we have moved on from the systemic crisis in the eurozone, it is now becoming clear to an increasing number of people that we have merely swapped a dramatic V-shaped collapse-followed-by recovery for a long-drawn-out period of weak growth. In my view, the eurozone will – at best – contribute nothing to global growth, perhaps for the next 3 to 5 years. If Spain ends up as the next Greece, then the picture will, in my view, be much worse.

5 – China is definitely ‘landing’, and policy easing is well behind the street’s expectations. I continue to have little doubt that China is transitioning from a 10% growth economy to a 7% growth economy this year. And over the next 3-5 years, that growth rate could be closer to 5% or less. I remain concerned at how little focus is given to the very poor demographics in China, and I remain concerned at how little focus there is on the state of the ‘banking’ balance sheet in China, and on the true levels of underlying indebtedness that exists in the Chinese economy.

6 – Over the next quarter or two I think there is unlikely to be any more money magic from the ECB – unless of course Spain really implodes. But in my view the market seems transfixed by Bernanke and his throw away promises. I remain convinced that we will NOT see any new real QE this year. Why? Simply put, more QE in the US would merely take gasoline prices up, perhaps by another 20%. This would, in my view, guarantee an abrupt halt to growth in the US and would likely ensure an Obama electoral defeat. This is not an outcome that Bernanke would desire. So at best, either in the June or July meeting, we will get some form of TWIST.

7 – Over the next few weeks we could see the ratings agencies move towards a wholesale downgrading of the global banking sector, driven by the application of new ratings methodologies. The markets seem extremely complacent on this issue.

8 – I assume no international military conflict in Iran.

So in essence, reflecting the economic truism that is ‘MV = YP’, I still see a world and markets more driven by the ‘M’ rather than the ‘V’ – and in Q2, more shots of ‘M’ are going to be elusive and ultimately what will actually be delivered will fall well short of market expectations. Also in Q2 the data (earnings and economic) will likely be weak. And in particular, the consumer is going to struggle and will I think be forced to re-save. Put all this together and I think in Q2 we should expect a nice 10% equity sell-off, with the S&P500 falling from 1420 (+/-20) to 1280 (+/-20). Credit should continue the sell-off of the last few weeks (iTraxx Crossover up at 750/800), and rates should rally with 10-year UST yields back below 2%, perhaps even down at 1.75%.

As we get later into Q2 I think the shrill promises of more fixes of ‘M’ from Bernanke will get loud, and many investors remain underweight risk, having missed out on Q1. As such, the expected correction should not exceed 10%. Over late Q2 and Q3, we could – likely should – see another leg higher in risk, driven by TWIST. This shot of ‘M’ may have a very short half-life in terms of boosting markets – four to six months perhaps – with the presidential elections clearly being the target. Much beyond early Q4 I think things will look extremely challenging, with the lack of self-sustaining growth/end demand, the lack of growth in Europe, weakening EM growth and the US fiscal debate being the key agenda items. I continue to believe that while equity prices may surprise on the upside in Q3/into the US elections, late Q4/early 2013 and the (lack of) growth and US fiscal stories could herald the next stage of the post-2008/09 ‘M’ bubble, i.e., the next major equity bear market.

Clearly fiscal and central bank activism and experimentation have, to date, succeeded in stretching out the cycle, but ultimately I still fear and expect the S&P500 – as the global risk-on/risk-off proxy – to trade at 800, and the Dow/Gold ratio to hit parity (currently at 8, down from an all-time high of 45 in late 1999) before we can begin the next multi-decade bull cycle. I think the battle between central bank inflationist policies and the natural cycle of deflationary debt deleveraging will continue to be attritional, and it may drag well into 2013 and 2014. I do however remain hopeful that in the next 12-24 months we will see both the basis form for the next major multi-year cycle of global economic development and we will see risk asset valuations at truly ‘once in a lifetime’ cheap levels. We are not yet at this point.”

Comments »

Gapping Up and Down This Morning

Gapping up

SVU +11.8%, CHK +1.3%, YPF +9.2%, ZNGA +0.9%,  ERT +1.9%, IAG +1.2%, AUY +1.2%, SLV +0.4%, GLD +0.3%,

NBG +19.5%, GPRC +19.4% ,  AKRX +7.9%,  CHK +1.3%,  RIMM +0.8% , BDX +0.7%, INFN +4.6%,  IOC +4% ,

AIG +2.2% ,  DELL +1.7%, VE +1.6%, VLO +1.2%,

Gapping down

VVUS -8.4%, SNE -8%, HLIT -5.2%, ORIG -3.1%, STM -2.7%, PPL -2.4%, MT -1.8%, RIO -1.5%,

ING -1.4%, CS -1.1%, BCS -1%, UBS -0.8% HBC -0.5%,  ORIG -3.1%, STM -2.7%, AOL -1.1% ,

Comments »

U.S. Equity Preview: PPL, HLIT, DLLR, & CHK,

Source

Chesapeake Energy Corp. (CHK) : The second-largest U.S. natural-gas producer announced three separate deals for its oil and gas assets, raising about $2.6 billion to help fund development and cut debt.

DFC Global Corp. (DLLR) : The provider of check-cashing services and consumer loans said it plans a private offering of $200 million in senior convertible notes due 2017.

Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) : The provider of video-delivery systems said first-quarter earnings were no more than 3 cents a share, missing the average analyst estimate of 9 cents.

PPL Corp. (PPL) : The energy and utility holding company will sell 9.9 million shares in a public offering.”

Comments »

Upgrades and Downgrades This Morning

Source

American International Group Inc. (NYSE: AIG) Raised to Outperform at Wells Fargo.

Dell Inc. (NASDAQ: DELL) Raised to Equal-weight at Morgan Stanley.

Foster Wheeler AG (NASDAQ: FWLT) Started as Overweight at JPMorgan.

Harley-Davidson, Inc. (NYSE: HOG) Raised to Buy at Citigroup.

KBR Inc. (NYSE: KBR) Started as Overweight at JPMorgan.

McDermott International Inc. (NYSE: MDR) Started as Overweight at JPMorgan.

Noble Corp. (NYSE: NE) Reiterated Buy with $50 target at Argus.

Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (NYSE: PLG) Cut to Neutral at Credit Suisse.

Randgold Resources Ltd. (NASDAQ: GOLD) target raised at Goldman Sachs.

Raymond James Financial Inc. (NYSE: RJF) Started as Outperform at Wells Fargo.

Saks Inc. (NYSE: SKS) Reiterated Buy with $14 target at Argus.

TiVo Inc. (NASDAQ: TIVO) Started as Neutral at JPMorgan.

Valero Energy Corporation (NYSE: VLO) Raised to Top Pick at Citigroup.

Veolia Environnement S.A. (NYSE: VE) Raised to Buy at Nomura.

Westport Innovations Inc. (NASDAQ: WPRT) Started as Overweight at Piper Jaffray.”

Comments »

Small Business Gets Skittish Over Inflation

“After six months of rising optimism, small business owners came back to earth in March, expressing concerns with inflation and rising prices in the National Federation of Independent Business’ latest Small Business Optimism Index survey.

The index fell nearly two points in March from February, when it was at its highest point in the past 12 months.

Even as the stock market continued to rise and unemployment[cnbc explains] continued to decline in March, business owners were not cheered by the numbers.

“One could have hoped it could keep going up,” William Dunkelberg, NFIB’s chief economist, told CNBC.com. Business owners remained subdued, he said, because “nothing has happened to make people feel good about the future.”

Nine of the 10 components in the index went down in March; business owners expressed pessimism in the areas of job creation, expectation of higher sales, easing of credit conditions, and earnings. The only area in which optimism increased was with inventories, which are low. As consumer confidenceremains unsteady, businesses are keeping inventories in check.

Dunkelberg said that the March report mirrors the one from March 2011, “and not in a good way.”

Read more

Comments »

Study: Obama’s Health Care Law Would Raise Deficit

Source 

“WASHINGTON (AP) — Reigniting a debate about the bottom line for President Barack Obama’s health care law, a leading conservative economist estimates in a study to be released Tuesday that the overhaul will add at least $340 billion to the deficit, not reduce it.

Charles Blahous, who serves as public trustee overseeing Medicareand Social Security finances, also suggested that federal accounting practices have obscured the true fiscal impact of the legislation, the fate of which is now in the hands of the Supreme Court.

Officially, the health care law is still projected to help reduce government red ink. The Congressional Budget Office, the government’s nonpartisan fiscal umpire, said in an estimate last year that repealing the law actually would increase deficits by $210 billion from 2012 to 2021.

The CBO, however, has not updated that projection. If $210 billion sounds like a big cushion, it’s not. The government has recently been running annual deficits in the $1 trillion range.

The White house dismissed the study in a statement late Monday. Presidential assistant Jeanne Lambrew called the study “new math (that) fits the old pattern of mischaracterizations” about the health care law.

Blahous, in his 52-page analysis released by George Mason University’s Mercatus Center, said, “Taken as a whole, the enactment of the (health care law) has substantially worsened a dire federal fiscal outlook.

“The (law) both increases a federal commitment to health care spending that was already unsustainable under prior law and would exacerbate projected federal deficits relative to prior law,” Blahous said.

The law expands health insurance coverage to more than 30 million people now uninsured, paying for it with a mix of Medicare cuts and new taxes and fees.

Blahous cited a number of factors for his conclusion:

— The health care’s law deficit cushion has been reduced by more than $80 billion because of the administration’s decision not to move forward with a new long-term care insurance program that was part of the legislation. The Community Living Assistance Services and Supports program raised money in the short term, but would have turned into a fiscal drain over the years.

— The cost of health insurance subsidies for millions of low-income and middle-class uninsured people could turn out to be higher than forecast, particularly if employers scale back their own coverage.

— Various cost-control measures, including a tax on high-end insurance plans that doesn’t kick in until 2018, could deliver less than expected.

The decision to use Medicare cuts to finance the expansion of coverage for the uninsured will only make matters worse, Blahous said. The money from the Medicare savings will have been spent, and lawmakers will have to find additional cuts or revenues to forestall that program’s insolvency.

Under federal accounting rules, the Medicare cuts are also credited as savings to that program’s trust fund. But the CBO and Medicare’s own economic estimators already said the government can’t spend the same money twice.

Blahous served in the George W. Bush White House from 2001-2009, rising to deputy director of the National Economic Council. He currently is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center.

His study was first reported late Monday by The Washington Post.”

Comments »

Morgan Stanley’s Top Equity Analyst Explains Why He is Bearish

“This morning, Morgan Stanley’s top equity strategist Adam Parker was on CNBC explaining his bearish outlook on stocks.

Sam Ro summarized Adam Parker’s beliefsin a post at the end of March.

  1. “Lower forecast earnings growth and more concentrated earnings among S&P stocks.”
  2. “Non-normalized interest rates and a vastly expanded Fed balance sheet.”
  3. “Much higher commodity prices, particularly oil.”
  4. “Index rebalancing has contributed to performance: 125 new firms have $82 billion more market cap than the outgoing companies had in 2006; also, 25% of income growth is from Apple.”

Parker’s conclusion:

Don’t pay a higher multiple for today’s corporate earnings!

For more on Parker’s negative outlook see here > “

Read more

Comments »