Most likely, the station was just testing its template for reporting results and accidentally put it up live.
Not only are the results screwy (Gingrich will probably get about half the % indicated), but the overall number of votes is waaay too high for a primary race.
Very interesting.
Paulista paranoia.
Most likely, the station was just testing its template for reporting results and accidentally put it up live.
Not only are the results screwy (Gingrich will probably get about half the % indicated), but the overall number of votes is waaay too high for a primary race.
Yep, Paulista paranoia.
http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/states/illinois
Note that the real vote total was less than a third of the vote total in the “ELECTION FRAUD” video.
But why spend two minutes on research when the time is better used ranting about a conspiracy to fix the vote?