iBankCoin
Joined Nov 11, 2007
31,929 Blog Posts

New York Times still desperate for OWS revolution

Shocking, breaking story here. The Times still craves a pro-Democratic Party movement so they’re beating this dying horse to…um…well, death.

Read the whole strained piece here (complete with unwarranted hope and disappointment):

In the wake of this week’s eviction of protesters from Zuccotti Park in New York and other urban campgrounds around the country, it’s tempting to dismiss the Occupy Wall Street movement as little more than a short-lived media phenomenon. The issues that spawned the movement — income inequality, money in politics and Wall Street’s influence — were being drowned out by debates over personal hygiene, noise and crime.

By Wednesday morning, when I dropped by the park, about 20 people, including some who looked disheveled and homeless, shared food and barely listened to a speaker with a graying ponytail who denounced New York as an “illegitimate police state.” Thursday’s “Day of Action” led to some more arrests, but it didn’t spawn the mass demonstrations some local politicians had predicted, let alone attract the throngs that the Tea Party mustered for a march on Washington in 2009.

But critics and supporters alike suggest that the influence of the movement could last decades, and that it might even evolve into a more potent force. “A lot of people brush off Occupy Wall Street as incoherent and inconsequential,” Michael Prell told me. “I disagree.”

Mr. Prell is a strategist for the Tea Party Patriots, a grass-roots organization that advocates Tea Party goals of fiscal responsibility, free markets and constitutionally limited government. He’s the author of “Underdogma,” a critique of left-wing anti-Americanism, which includes a chapter on the Berkeley Free Speech movement of the 1960s, which may be the closest historical parallel to the Occupy movement.

“They claim to stand up on behalf of the ‘little guy’ (the 99 percent), while raising a fist of protest against the big, rich, greedy and powerful 1 percent,” he said of the Occupy movement. “The parallels between Occupy Wall Street and the Berkeley Free Speech Movement are too clear to ignore — right down to the babbling incoherence of the participants. The lesson from Berkeley in the 1960s and the protest movement they spawned is: it doesn’t matter that they don’t make sense. What matters is they are tapping into a gut-level instinct that is alive, or lying dormant, in almost every human being. And, when they unleash the power of standing up for the powerless against the powerful — David vs. Goliath — the repercussions can ripple throughout our society for decades.”

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter

6 comments

  1. ctb007

    The New York Times does a shit job of pushing an agenda to sell Newspapers.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  2. Geoduck

    New York an “illegitimate police state.” New York Times apparently agrees with that speaker. Their arrogance is appalling. Their advertising trumpets their arrogance.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  3. ottnott

    You need to set your sentiments aside for a moment and note that the public wants something very different from what either party is providing.

    Right Track/Wrong Track is polling 75% wrong track, 18% right.

    The two Senate leaders are getting only 17% and 21% job approval ratings. The House leaders are barely better, with 26% and 27% job approval.

    Obama’s approval on the economy is only 35%, but there is no sign that the public is eager to put one of his GOP opponents in the White House or to put the GOP in charge of Congress.

    So, you have deep dissatisfaction with the state of the country coupled with a rejection of the usual organizations and institutions that people would normally call on to address the causes of the dissatisfaction.

    I fully expect public expressions of the dissatisfaction will continue, whether under the OWS label or Tea Party label or something new.

    The public isn’t sure what it wants. I only hope they will know it when they see it (or at least recognize if ideas are “hotter” or “colder”), and that they won’t be satisfied with being told what they want.

    The moneyed people and institutions planning to spend billions on the 2012 elections are the same ones that had outsized voices over the last few elections. You can expect their dollars to continue to favor election of good foot soldiers for their causes instead of good leaders for the country.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"
  4. mhass33

    The problem in this country is the mindset of the people living in it. Nothing more nothing less

    • 0
    • 0
    • 0 Deem this to be "Fake News"