loose change is a joke. It’s very misleading and in some ways dishonest. Try the site “screw loose change” to get some perspective on some of the so-called questions raised by loose change.
As one specific example – I noticed that in all their films they claimed that the buildings fell at freefall speed. But they didn’t. You can very simply count the seconds on some of the videos and clearly it’s longer than freefall speed and the entire building isn’t even down yet at that point. They use this “freefall speed” catchphrase to try to argue that it was a controlled demolition (because all controlled demolitions take the building down at freefall speed). But that is nothing more than a buzzword because freefall speed didn’t happen on 9/11. Go ahead and count the seconds.
Bush and his tribe don’t hold a candle to the subterfuge of this (never waste a crisis) administration. They were orders of magnitude less intelligent and incapable of half the thought they are given credit for.
i just listened tot he video and frankly its presented out of context a bit, he was suggesting an attack he was hypothesizing that people would be more worried about terrorism again after an attack.
Saying they “let it happen” implies intent. That’s a major accusation, and I have yet to see any compelling evidence suggesting that. I have however seen evidence of negligence and being “asleep at the wheel” as you termed it. That does not mean they knew and then intentionally let it happen, though.
Then that was another form of negligence. That doesn’t mean Bush administration didn’t commit any. They ignored all the warning signs, including when Bush was briefed that an attack was imminent. Did they beef up airplane security? Did they take any action? No, that briefing was ignored. And he wasn’t the only one! So saying Clinton was also negligent is also true but doesn’t excuse anyone else.
IF! Clinton had taken care of Bin Laden Bizniss when he should/could have, the idiots in the Bush administration would not have been faced with the problem in the first place. just sayin……..
Warren Buffett knew 9/11 was coming. Why? How? Where is information about the supposed golf event he was at? And why is does 9/11 truth movement seem like a CIA or foreign intelligence operation to create dissent needed for a revolution and a cout de ta?
I’m more skeptical about 9/11 truth and OWS and Tea party movement. If they want the “new world order” conspiracy theorists talk about… The protesting is the first step needed, the reaction is increased police force which causes increased dissention towards police and greater rioting and ultimately an overthrow or police state and the UN steps in to save the day as the global governing body or something along these lines.
Bin Ladin was the guy claiming he was behind everything including the Oklahoma City Bombing: he’s a wanna be gangsta who wanted to be remembered for something but was nuttin but a wangsta like Ja Rule… He was too chicken shit to do anything but deal heroine and do a chicken shit Arab dance and get Arab money.
Mad Scientist. How do you explain the field in PA where they were using a garden hose to put out some ash where the plane crashed & left the roughly 20′ in diameter hole in ground. First time in history a fucking plane crashes and they cant find a single passenger, nor any debris. Oh yeah, they found a piece to the wing 5 miles away. Even the reporters that day, were like “it doesn’t appear as though a plane crashe here”.lol.
Ever watched loose chchange? I’m not a conspiracy theorist but its interesting.
loose change is a joke. It’s very misleading and in some ways dishonest. Try the site “screw loose change” to get some perspective on some of the so-called questions raised by loose change.
As one specific example – I noticed that in all their films they claimed that the buildings fell at freefall speed. But they didn’t. You can very simply count the seconds on some of the videos and clearly it’s longer than freefall speed and the entire building isn’t even down yet at that point. They use this “freefall speed” catchphrase to try to argue that it was a controlled demolition (because all controlled demolitions take the building down at freefall speed). But that is nothing more than a buzzword because freefall speed didn’t happen on 9/11. Go ahead and count the seconds.
Pahleeeeze people. Give it up already.
Bush and his tribe don’t hold a candle to the subterfuge of this (never waste a crisis) administration. They were orders of magnitude less intelligent and incapable of half the thought they are given credit for.
i just listened tot he video and frankly its presented out of context a bit, he was suggesting an attack he was hypothesizing that people would be more worried about terrorism again after an attack.
as much as I couldn’t stand bush&co, i agree … out of context
however, I do believe they knew a 9-11 was in the works and let it happen, for all intents & purposes, because they were asleep at the wheel or worse
But being “asleep at the wheel” is something very different than “letting it happen.”
Saying they “let it happen” implies intent. That’s a major accusation, and I have yet to see any compelling evidence suggesting that. I have however seen evidence of negligence and being “asleep at the wheel” as you termed it. That does not mean they knew and then intentionally let it happen, though.
“”Wasn’t” suggesting. Phone error
No. Negligence was not going after Bin Laden after Oliver North called him out during a congressional hearing back during Clinton’s watch in the 90’s.
Then that was another form of negligence. That doesn’t mean Bush administration didn’t commit any. They ignored all the warning signs, including when Bush was briefed that an attack was imminent. Did they beef up airplane security? Did they take any action? No, that briefing was ignored. And he wasn’t the only one! So saying Clinton was also negligent is also true but doesn’t excuse anyone else.
IF! Clinton had taken care of Bin Laden Bizniss when he should/could have, the idiots in the Bush administration would not have been faced with the problem in the first place. just sayin……..
The Huffington Post reported on this back in May, 2008: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/13/rumsfeld-on-2006-election_n_101537.html
Warren Buffett knew 9/11 was coming. Why? How? Where is information about the supposed golf event he was at? And why is does 9/11 truth movement seem like a CIA or foreign intelligence operation to create dissent needed for a revolution and a cout de ta?
I’m more skeptical about 9/11 truth and OWS and Tea party movement. If they want the “new world order” conspiracy theorists talk about… The protesting is the first step needed, the reaction is increased police force which causes increased dissention towards police and greater rioting and ultimately an overthrow or police state and the UN steps in to save the day as the global governing body or something along these lines.
Bin Ladin was the guy claiming he was behind everything including the Oklahoma City Bombing: he’s a wanna be gangsta who wanted to be remembered for something but was nuttin but a wangsta like Ja Rule… He was too chicken shit to do anything but deal heroine and do a chicken shit Arab dance and get Arab money.
Mad Scientist. How do you explain the field in PA where they were using a garden hose to put out some ash where the plane crashed & left the roughly 20′ in diameter hole in ground. First time in history a fucking plane crashes and they cant find a single passenger, nor any debris. Oh yeah, they found a piece to the wing 5 miles away. Even the reporters that day, were like “it doesn’t appear as though a plane crashe here”.lol.
Are you saying It looked like the Fly’s chicken flaming eyebrow barbeque?
Sorry I’m talking all sorts of crazy.