[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TTC6FJphWA 450 300]
“Freedom,” do you hear, it?
_________________________________________
The above well wishes may be outdated by the time of this posting, as there is a rumour (sic) that Representative Bart Stupak, one of the last principled Democrats, has succumbed to the bribe disease that has overtaken nearly every member of Congress, may Allah throw them all out on their patoots this coming November.
If that’s so, we’re cooked for long term, as the inevitable government imposed rationing takes hold, and destroys a vital part of our economy in the process. Say goodbye to the solid, high quality healthcare you’ve enjoyed for so long, it’s about to be controlled by Health and Human Services.
And don’t get me wrong, there’s nothing wrong with rationing — it’s a natural economic process that occurs in all supply and demand-based transactions. It happens in our interaction with health care service providers the same way it occurs in our other daily decisions. Problem is, at this point in history the more natural flow of free market supply and demand that reflects efficient rationing in pricing has already been cast askew by government intervention in our health care system. This has resulted in a limiting of service supply that has greatly overtaxed our provider community.
Unfortunately, the new top down mandates of Obamacare will only exacerbate that situation, as additional “insurance” recipients are added to the rolls, with no attendant increase in service providers or pricing (at least according to the Obamacare mandates). This will result in exit by providers and service workers, a natural result of price fixing that we’ve seen exhibited in every situation where it’s been attemped.
If you take anything away from this piece, remember that “price fixing leads to shortages,” as sure as extended drought leads to famine. (Banque coin on it via The PPT.)
Trying to talk around such natural phenomenon is like arguing with a rock falling to the ground that he is being “bourgeoise” and “oppressive.” In fact, it’s been a long time curiousity of mine why people would believe that natural economic processes that have been proven time and again over our recorded history, can somehow be evaded by the “right amount of state conviction.” Marxism did not work for lack of trying, after all.
For those of you who understand rational market actions, there is some faint hope, however.
First, this bill may fall apart under the weight of judicial scrutiny, given the myriad bribes and singular giveaways that have been stuffed into it. Second, the way this bill is looking to be semi-passed, via the “deeming” process Representative Slaughter has propose, may very well not stand Constitutional challenge.
Third, and probably most likely, the passing of this bill may well usher in a sea-change away from our current Big Government political trends. Enough economically sapped and pissed off citizens have awoken to this hijacking of our Constitutional precepts that we may see a large scale revamping of Congress that renders President Obama the lamest of ducks, sends the far left Madame Pelosi back to the rear bench, and Harry Reid home for extended fishing in Lake Tahoe (with Fredo?).
If that in fact does happens, I look for a renaissance in the markets, much like we experienced after the 1994 elections, when Gingrich’s Revolution stopped Bill (and Hillary’s) Clinton’s earlier attempt to Alinsky-ize the country toward a permanently government-first economy. I think we may also see a desparate Dem Congress, seeing the writing on the wall, try to break the massive groundswell against them by throwing bon bons to the economy and markets. This could set up for an explosive combination come this summer.
Remember that markets are forward rationalizing, however, and that Barack Obama (thus far) has shown himself to be less pliant than Bill Clinton. It’s very possible the best we can hope for, until 2012, is gridlock.
Given what we’ve withstood in the last year, that may very well be a balm.
Best to you all, and remember what Brooklyn’s finest said:
Update: “Deem and Pass Option May be Dead” according to WaPo report… I don’t take comfort in this however, if it’s coming from the Dems, as it likely means they have Stupak, and the other nays corralled and can pass it with a regular vote. I cannot wait to see the chicanery results (ie, “the bribes”) that got this thing done…
__________________________
Second Update: A real hope for the future, Representative Paul Ryan (R, WI), responding to the demagogues:
[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4qy3bGYii8 450 300]
______________
Comments »
(That’s right folks, not one whit of logical reply or argument yet. Pure “attack the person.” Demonstrative, no? –ed.)
(LOL. Certainly makes the response easier doesn’t it? One wonders if the troll even realizes he’s making it difficult to ascertain whether he’s really even got an argument yet? There’s no mention of support for socialized medicine, yet, fwiw. — ed.)
(That’s right, save for that little unbolded bit above, we’re still doing about .050 out of 1.000 on the “repliable argument” scale. Don’t act surprised, this is actually a decent ratio for most internet trolls. — ed.)
And that’s pretty much all there is folks. Amazing, no?
First, I’d like to thank Alvari, whom I’ve affectionately dubbed “Lungsac” due to an early misreading of his name, for giving me such a great example of exactly what’s behind most trollish arguments — ironically, ” a lot of expelled hot air.”
As a sop, and a “thank you,” I will now address the very few addressable arguments he provided in contradiction…
First, his argument that medical personel will not exit the industry upon imposition of price capitation. Note, he doesn’t really have an argument against that statement, only a weak attack on the polling source I provided:
Note, it’s hard for him to even get a partially data-based statement out without referring reflexively to presumably evil “right wingers,” or worse, the Left’s most hated bogeyman, “Fox News.”
I have no knowledge of this being “used by right wingers,” for the record. I simply took the first article on the subject I found on Google. The internet is replete with examples of doctor’s being at their breaking point. I guess Google is become an arm of the nefarious Murdoch Empire, I don’t know.
That’s probably why he couldn’t supply anything that says doctors will be seeking to pick up more Medicare patients and other government payors as a result of this wonderful legislation. Meanwhile, I can find many more articles on the displeasure of the provider community. No doubt, it’s all a “right wing conspiracy” brought to you by Fox News!
Second, let’s take the World Health Organization (“WHO”) left wing talking point put forth by M. Le Troll, which claims the US is the “37th ranked healthcare service in the world.” First, a reasonable person might ask, “What is the WHO?” Not many will be surprised to find this fraying crutch of the left is the largely anti-American United Nations’ health advocacy group with a strong predisposition to socialized medicine “for all my friends.”
“Quelle suprise,” no? Now, is anyone surprised to find that the WHO’s criteria for a decent health care system mandates a socialized medicine diktat? I quote CATO’s evisceration of this leftist fallacy:
In closing, I welcome sensible argument, even from the hard left. But if all the trolls can bring is envious ad hominem, I have no interest in responding.
Be forewarned, proponents of government health care– your assumptions and your emotional arguments will be challenged at every juncture. Gird your loins for further demolition.
Best to you all, even the misguided Leninists.
___________________________________
Update: Can you imagine Barack Obama had been delivering speeches like this as Congresscritter? Here’s a follow up… did he deliver any?
[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwk1aHU-pms 450 300]______________