Well, it was certainly good and entertaining while it lasted. But we can’t carry on reading the emails of John Podesta for the rest of our lives, can we? Poor John. All he wanted to do was subvert the third estate and get his bitch into power.
If Ecuador ceded to John Kerry and the Obama administration, then I’m never gonna eat ceviche in the Galápagos Islands. I promise you here and now, I’ll never do it.
This from the morons at Fox.
#Fox reported #assange to be arrested today! #Wikileaks #podestaemails11 #Trump #MAGA #Veritas #PodestaEmails10 pic.twitter.com/fz9hlzAgky
— B. Sue for Trump (@SuePickles80) October 18, 2016
If true, we all knew it’d happen sooner or later. The only problem for World government is that by arresting Assange you make him a martyr and 10,000 others replace him, like terrorists — but for freedom and transparency instead of retrograde sentimentalities.
Nevertheless, Assange did good and is a true hero, a symbol of unvarnished truth in a sea of morbid lies and filth.
If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on Twitter
“by arresting Assange you make him a martyr and 10,000 others replace him”
We can certainly hope so. And yet the totally clueless supporters of the ClintonCriminalCartel are still calling for his death by our government.
the protests will be epic should they arrest him and put him on trial .. unless Hillary gets her finger on the drone trigger
Taking him out will not stop them. They have built up massive contingency plans.
I think more people don’t care than do care … if more people did care and did investigate and read on their own, Clinton wouldn’t be ahead on the polls. But she is and the random surveys I’ve done re: Wikileaks.. not aware or shrug it off as some GOP ploy.
We’re too deep in this to change course. It will take generations to fix this mess. Maybe when I come back as a grasshopper and assuming one of your iBC readers doesn’t crush me under your shoe.. I will witness an actual change and not one promised by a politician.
Marc,
You don’t care. You’re projecting.
Assange was a traitor for most on the right, until now….
Convenient. If he had any integrity he would not be using the russians to leak the info. He would not allow them to manipulate the info as it has been documented they have in many instances. He would also expose the other side. Slowly, even Assange supporters have begun to move away. They question his intent, sanity and ego. He wont be arrested. Just like the Brits did not storm the embassy yesterday….
Honest question: I keep hearing about “Russian involvement”, but have yet to see anything more than circumstantial evidence. You say that it is “documented”……can you show me where? I’m honestly interested in seeing some actual evidence; something more than some partisan “expert” that tells us to just believe them.
I would care if anyone else but Trump were running. I love my kids and country too much for that to happen. Assange is a rapist (allegedly) and a scoundrel.
If you’d care then you’d vote
Polls?
You mean the fake polls
I have noticed Trump signs on lawns in PA that never had Romney signs. Hilary signs are not present.
Regards
Chuck Bennett
Clearly civilized people don’t live in that shit hole part of PA. Yes, every poll is fake. Trump is way ahead and will overcome the rigged election. Then, the economy will grow by 10% annually with no taxes and no Mexicans. The Wall will be HUGE and everyone will live happily ever after with unicorns in every garage. XXOO Trump.
I wish he won but we had a reset button and could revert back to him not winning. I want all these people who don’t make any money (no benefit from his tax plan), depend on all kinds of government programs, would benefit from more Unions, live in states where climate change (FL, LA) is a real and present danger, also on states where fracking will go unchecked (OK) and increase earthquakes from 2k to 5k, depend on SS and medicare (Old people), which as they streamline gov like a business will get cut, have crappy jobs that offer no health insurance and hate obama care and dont understand that the public option is the only solution, make minimum wage, dig up coal and get black lung instead of benefiting from investments in clean energy (WV, OH, PA) and on and on and on. But will still vote for him. I want that just so they can see how they really voted against themselves. I wonder who they will blame then???
Is Ecuador due to roll some bonds in the next year?
As long as Ecuador will put him up, but cut off his internet access, why would the US even want him arrested. I think Kerry would gladly cover the bill for his care and leave him there indefinitely. Anyway, I guess we’ll see.
Don’t care much for Assange, but Wikileaks serves a purpose. Too bad that recently they seem to have become tool of the Russians who want to launder what they hack. Have they ever published anything embarrassing to the former Soviet block?
If Wikileaks goes down, someone else will pick it up. They live on the edge of the law, I expect it should always be a high risk job.
“Too bad that recently they seem to have become tool of the Russians who want to launder what they hack”
– Is there any actual evidence beyond the tired old “my expert says so”? I’m no hacker, but even I could set up a VPN and mirror a connection. We’re suposed to believe that Russian hackers couldnt figure out how to use VPN’s and route using mirrors? Unless there is some hard evidence out there (would love to see it); the most logical explanation is that “the russians did it” excuse is just a distraction excuse for an embarassed party.
“Have they ever published anything embarrassing to the former Soviet block?”
– Seriously? How about the Panama papers for starters? Im not trying to give you a hard time, Longview, but do you just accept everything you hear on CNN hook line and sinker without looking for the source yourself? Given the now proven (podesta emails) collusion between MSM and Clinton, I would think most intelligent people would begin to question the narratives they are being fed and seek out the source data in order to form their own opinion.
Hey Billie, I try to be reasonable and fair. You’re right do I have any proof? No.
But obviously I still have more faith in some of our organizations and institutions than you do. Some them report they’ve made the case with high certainty.
You are right about the Panama Papers, they weren’t at targeted at the US. My memory is too short. But those disclosure hit elites in lots of different countries, too. And was Wikileaks deeply involved in their disclosure? I thought Assange was actually pretty critical about the way it was handled.
Anyhow. Peace.
By the way my comments were reflecting on this report (among others):
On Sunday, Pence for the second time in recent weeks broke from Drumpf on Russia, this time on that country’s possible involvement in email hacks tied to the U.S. election, saying Moscow should face “severe consequences” if it has compromised U.S. email security.
“I think there’s no question that the evidence continues to point in that direction,” Pence said. “There should be severe consequences to Russia or any sovereign nation that is compromising the privacy or the security of the United States of America,” Pence said on “Fox News Sunday.”
Which came from this article:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-rigged-idUSKBN12G0SU
Though it has been pretty widely reported (speculated?) elsewhere.
have you seen the source interview of Pence where he made those remarks? It’s true that he said those things, but some of those words were emphasized in the live interview, that had some important context and emphasis (“if”) that the article didn’t capture. Worth looking for the clip to compare for yourself if the quotes accurately reflect Pence’s intention. To my ear, it was pretty clear the reporter was pressuring for a statement and phrased the question in a way that required an answer similar to what Pence gave. The reporter basically laid out a scenario where there was Deinitive proof that Russia had intervened and then asked Pence if he would support retaliation under that scenario, where a smoking gun existed. What Pence should have answered is “I won’t answer speculative hypothetical situations” the notion that ANY nation can pinpoint the origin of high level hackers is just laughable. Covering tracks is step 1. For example; Its been reported that the Panama papers were leaked by the US gov’t in order to hurt Russian oligarchs. (High level US launderers were conspicuously missing.) The point is, that of course this happens back and forth between nations and there is no way anyone can trace it. The fact that Hillary is using this excuse as a distraction is just evidence of her avoiding the subject and playing upon the ignorance of the American people. I have great faith in the American People, I just don’t have faith in the leadership.