All You Biches[sic] Got Elliot Waved
Wednesday, January 7, 2009 at 4:00 pm
I cleaned up today.
I mopped the floor with my shorts harder than the poor lunch janitor on kindergarten chili day.
At 904 to 905, I covered them all.
I think the market is still egregious here, but I need to examine today’s action further as it wasn’t totally convincing and I have reason to suspect that poofters across America’s heartland will want to buy this dip.
This is both a lesson and a warning.
- Good day.
Nice Job! Any chance of a daily LoBV update this week? (I requested it over on the G on G thread a few seconds ago). Thanks.
yeah I’m running the #s and will post the charts in a new opst once done.
If you didn’t see my other reply, first, anytime you want to see em comment and I’ll post em (if I see the request) and two, and I am working on an automated, 24/7 availability to everyone LoBV. So thats something to look forward too.
Danny, I thought about you today, and your (our) shorts. It felt good to see a good plan come to fruition.
Thanks Shed.
Indeed, you played this one better, timing-wise, being bullish then bearish. Although you never made any long plays, at least you weren’t stymied short for EODec. (correct if wrong)
It seems like I been in this play for 6 wks, but really, it’s been like 10 days.
Listening to the bozos, I would have covered at 936 for a comfortable 4 digit loss.
tomorrow is a new fight.
Nice to see you make a little money every now and again, kid.
________
He uses it to pay the interest on that student loan money he’s been playing the market with …. hence the balless nature of his trades.
Listen E8, I have a blog on this site. It is mine. Something tells me Fly isn’t going to fire me for espousing my view that EW is gay.
Good luck going to an establishment and telling ONE OF THE OWNERS that he left his balls on the floor, or that he reads some homo EW site, or that his trades are ballless.
SEE what type of reaction you get in person with that strategy. Oh, but this is the internet, land of the brave.
You’ll notice I refrained from childish name-calling and ad hominem attacks. The reason is because I don’t want my next point to be misconstrued — It’s a losing battle E8. You come to my table with copy-pasted info. You add no value. You’re not even funny, like Jake. So good job. I put my shit out there, and for what? Maybe for nothing, but some people appreciate it, and it’s more than you do.
Oh, and I have zero debt.
I’m not into pointless internet squabbles, so I say we squash this now.
And apparently you can dish it out but not take it … as soon as I give you shit you lose it … WTF?
As I recall, you asked me to continue posting the OEW stuff … but as requested, I will no longer do so as your body language speaks volumes.
This isn’t an egalitarian board, sorry if you misunderstood. You are not in a position to dish to me. Having a thin/thick skin isn’t the issue.
You are insulting me personally.
“He uses it to pay the interest on that student loan money he’s been playing the market with …. hence the balless nature of his trades.”
“Incompetence:
What level did we reverse from today, exactly? 944.
What level will we never see again? 960.”
“So you mopped the floor with your shorts but left your balls there just in case we bounce …. lol!”
————-
You project my views on EW to yourself. You assume I must think your a douche, since you closely follow something that is patently gay. That’s a wholly incorrect assumption, at the outset.
I think your shit-talking in conjunction with providing no original info makes you…well, where does that leave you on the totem pole of msg board respect?
Contribute if you have something to contribute (pictures of goat asses don’t qualify as contributions on Danny’s blog - to my great astonishment).
This is, indeed, the internet. Comments here are just letters on a screen. A click makes them away. No need to give such unsubstantial objects power over your real life and emotions.
For the most part, I have learned to judge what appears on my screen by a very simple criteria - is it worth the time to read it. Yes? Seek out more of the same. No? Reduce or avoid.
reduce and avoid, thats beautiful in it’s simplicity.
You’re totally right about not letting the nets get to you.
Me and E8 both have better things to do with our time.
As an internet parasite, I have a selfish interest in keeping the host organism happy and productive.
Like discussing girl on girl …
“poofters” — nice usage danny. hilar.
Ottnott, excellent post.
another one of my favorite sayings is… I don’t have to attend every argument I’m invited to.
exactly E8.
JG - I think the poofters give it a go, but I’ve been thinking about that waterloo comment matt made, and it’s clear I have much work to do tonight.
boca - thats a good one too
“I think your shit-talking in conjunction with providing no original info makes you…well, where does that leave you on the totem pole of msg board respect?”
Apparently (according to your criteria) in a long line of commenters here at IBC … guess I’m among good company … thanks for the compliment.