iBankCoin
Home / Chess’s Greatest Hits (page 5)

Chess’s Greatest Hits

Two Months for Rip Van Winkle

_________

MARKET WRAP UP 07/19/10

Nearly two months ago, on May 20th, the S&P 500 closed at 1071. Today, after chopping around this morning, the S&P rallied in the afternoon to close up 0.60% to 1071 as well. Since late May, although we have gone as a high as 1131, and as low as 1010, the overall market has been a complete waste of time for the vast majority of traders. This type of price action seems to be reflected in sentiment, as many traders are not so much bearish as they are apathetic and, perhaps more so, frustrated. As I noted last evening, several key sectors have been “dead money” for nearly a year now, and the broad market can be viewed as dead money as well, over the past two months.

The origin of the broad channel that I denoted on the updated and annotated daily chart of the S&P 500, seen below, should illustrate my point about the previous two months.

________

_________

The operative phrase is that we are still in no man’s land, with the bears getting the longer term edge. Despite the fact that the bulls closed us just above the 20 day moving average, we remain firmly below all of the other major moving averages–notably the declining 50 day. Taking some small positions within the broad channel is fine, so long as you are willing to accept the lack of a discernible trend since late May. For most traders, trending markets offer easier opportunities to make profits than do oscillating ones.

Turning to other indices and sectors, the Nasdaq, Russell 2000 (small caps), and Dow Jones Transportation Average all remain within their falling channels. As their respective daily charts illustrate below, only the most agile short term traders have an edge in this type of choppy market.

________

_________

_________

________

As for my personal portfolio, I sold out of my remaining 1/2 position in $LULU today. As I noted earlier, I sold off my first 1/2 a few days ago, to lock in a nice profit. However, I sold the final 1/2 today at break even, because I did not like the way the chart was starting to look, and I wanted to avoid turning a winner into a loser.

I also currently have 1/2 position in $NR. I sold the first 1/2 off earlier this month for a nice profit, when the stock launched higher above $7.00. As I noted back then, I wanted to wait for the stock to retest the $6.50 area, on low volume. However, no such pullback has occurred. Instead, the stock has formed a nice, tight base above all major moving averages. So long as the broad market does not fall apart here, I am strongly considering going back to a full position in this name.

When a stock comes to terms with a price level in an orderly way after a sharp run up, I consider that a very bullish setup. The reason being is because the aggressive buyers who initially pushed the stock higher seem to have conviction in holding their positions, despite the move higher. This tells me that higher prices could still be in the cards.

Even if $NR is not for you, as a practice in pattern recognition, as well as combining strong volume to confirm price action, take a look at the daily and weekly charts, seen below.

_______

________

_________

TOTAL PORTFOLIO:

EQUITIES: 32%

  • LONG: 32% ($NR $NTAP $THOR $SAPE $SWSI)

CASH: 68%

Comments »

Protect Yourself at All Times

__________

At a very early age, I quickly learned that my father had no intention of raising me with kid gloves. I remember being six years old and sitting in front of the television with him, watching the weekend boxing matches. I suppose, according to modern day psychology, I should have been traumatized for life, being exposed to that much real-time violence, blood and guts. Interestingly, I never had nightmares or anything of the like. In fact, I barely remember the actual fighting between the boxers. I do not remember much in the way of blood or anything gory either.

What I do vividly remember, however, is how my father would remind me before each and every fight of how to tell if the referee was any good. He told me that, just before the match commenced, if the referee advised the boxers to “protect yourself at all times,” then he was a good referee. If he did not, then he was a subpar official. Perhaps it may seem like a trivial way to judge a referee, but the point I took away from that is sometimes it is necessary to be reminded of the obvious. Although the boxers had a team of trainers, physicians and managers in their respective corners, they were ultimately all alone inside the ring, with nowhere to hide. If the opposing boxer decided to take a cheap shot at you even after the bell for the end of the round had rung, you still had to look out and protect yourself.

Similarly, in the stock market individual traders can often forget that, at the end of the day, they are singularly responsible for their profits and losses. Too often, the temptation for many retail traders is to latch on to a high profile trader and mimic their every move without much regard for risk tolerance and position sizing. This is an easy trap to fall into, as it serves as a way for retail traders to mentally absolve themselves of guilt, should they blow up their trading accounts. However, make no mistake that expecting some type of miracle bailout for your losses will not happen, at least not for us little people.

As this concept pertains to the current market, the overarching theme that I see over the past year has been the way in which Mr. Market has chopped up traders failing to adequately protect themselves. Those traders who enjoyed riding the trend down in 2008, and the subsequent trend back up for a few quarters in 2009, have since found a noticeable lack of a new trend ever since. To illustrate this point, let us take a look at some of the key areas that experienced huge run ups and subsequent crashes earlier this decade: the financials, emerging markets, and homebuilders. I think it is fair to say that all three of these areas were at the heart of the bubbles in credit, real estate and globalization/commodities. Naturally, they experienced a sharp rally off of the 2008 lows. However, they have since become “dead money.”

In each of the following weekly charts, notice how, for roughly the past year, traders who went long in anticipation of a breakout, or shorted a potential breakdown, have been repeatedly punished. Traders who properly hedged themselves likely made out well reasonably well, all things considered. Only the traders who combined experience, agility, clearheaded thinking, not to mention a healthy dose of luck were able to crush this market.

There is no way of knowing how long this period of overall dead money will last. Many market players believe that we will soon see a major breakdown. Other traders think that we are on the cusp of a significant breakout to new highs. Until the market definitively breaks one way or the other–and holds that break–remember now more than ever to protect yourself at all times.

___________

__________

__________

__________

Comments »

The Story of Maximum Boom-Boom

A few years ago, I took a trip out to Los Angeles and found myself sitting in the best poker game I have ever seen, to this day. I was playing $100/$200 limit Texas Hold ‘Em at the Commerce Casino. To a person, the table was full of players not just playing every single hand they were dealt, but raising and re-raising with them on every single betting round.  Needless to say, they were playing very “loose,” and very aggressive.  In a full game (9-10 players) of limit Texas Hold ’em, very few starting hands show a large enough profit over the long run to justify playing very many of them.  You should be folding most of the hands that you are dealt before seeing the first three community cards.  The correct strategy is to be “tight” by only playing the best starting hands (pocket aces, KK, QQ, JJ, TT, Ace King suited, etc.) yet also very aggressive when you are finally dealt them.  Generally speaking, you want to be patient and then raise and re raise with big pairs, and big suited hands. Of course, you will play other hands, but only in select situations.

For the first few hours that I sat at the table, I felt like it was correct to fold every single hand that I was dealt. When the game you are sitting in is very aggressive, you should be playing even tighter than usual, as the variance–or volatility–of the size of the pots and your own price swings are exacerbated.  Beyond that strategy, however, I was so-called “card dead,” as I was consistently looking down at hands like 2-8 off suit. Because of how loose all of the other players were, it made absolutely no sense to try to bluff them with my horrendous cards, since they would not be folding.

Naturally, the players around me were oblivious to my absence from participation, as they were either drunk or in some euphoric state of degenerate gambling nirvana. At the risk of stereotyping, in poker you want to sit at tables with women and men wearing flashy jewelry.  You want to sit in games where people are boisterous, emotional and loud.  If they are drinking alcohol and/or have been playing for hours or days on end, all the better. You want to play with people who are having fun gambling, without too much regard for the math involved.

About two and half hours into my playing session, I looked down at the Ace of spades and the Ace of clubs.  I raised and got raised three more times to cap the betting action before we even saw the “flop” (first three community cards).  No one folded.  It was all nine of us in the pot for $3600 before the we even saw the flop! The flop came down 2-2-7, all of different suits. Understand that this one of, if not the, very best flops you can see when you are holding A-A in a wild game. I raised and re raised my hand until the betting action was capped.  No one folded.  The next card was a 6.  I bet, a middle aged Asian gentleman raised me and, surprisingly, everyone else folded.  I re raised, as I could beat many hands in this situation.  However, he kept raising me back until I just called. The last card was a 3.  There were no flush possibilities on the board.  I bet, and he raised again. So, I just called.  The Asian man turned over 4-5 for an unlikely straight, which he had caught perfectly on the fourth and fifth cards.

As he raked in the massive pot, he gave me a playful smile and screamed “maximum boom-boom!” in a thick Chinese accent, while pointing to my second-place pocket aces.  He had been screaming that little phrase after each big pot he won. I said “nice hand, sir,” while my stomach did a few somersaults.

I took a break and walked away from the table for a minute to collect my thoughts.  Should I leave the game? Well, I ran through a checklist of questions that I ask myself when considering whether to pick up my chips and leave.

How well was I playing?

I was playing very well, and  I was not tired nor making emotional decisions.

How good was the game in terms of potential profitability?

It was a great game with loose and careless players playing very poorly despite their aggression.

Before I asked myself any other questions, I knew I had to return to the game, so long as I did not surpass my stop loss. I noticed several of the regular, winning players were on the waiting list and looking eager to get into the game. Indeed, it was a great game.

A few more hours went by, and I was losing about $2,700.  Normally, if I lost my initial buy-in ($5,000), I would get up and leave, as a stop-loss. The casino would always be open, and I could come back the next day and start fresh.  A few of the crazy players were getting lucky, including Mr. Maximum Boom-Boom, and many of them were simply passing their money back and forth to each other with each crazy hand.

I wish I could give you a rousing finale to the story. But, there wasn’t.  I got dealt a few more quality starting hands and lost the hands, along with my buy-in.  I could have easily bought back into the game for another $5,000, but I knew I would be digging myself a deeper hole in the face of a wild game, with wild swings.  So, I stood up and I left the game.  The next few days on my trip I gradually won back the money I had lost. The games were tougher and not as juicy, so it was a slow grind trying to win.  It truly was an elevator down, stairs back up type of situation.

Despite the fact that I knew I was playing my cards in a way that was profitable over the long term, that night I had to respect the fact that short term luck can have a surprisingly heavy influence on any one poker game.

As much as I wanted to take the otherwise pleasant and funny Asian man’s money, to let my ego get involved would likely have been a costly mistake given the short term luck he was having, compared to mine.  It also occurred to me how ironic his little catch phrase was, as without any kind of stop-loss, you are destined to experience a maximum boom boom, in terms of your downside risk.  Just as in the stock market, your poker losses can mount up very quickly.

Despite the money that I lost, walking away from that juicy, stellar game remains one of the best decisions that I have made and am proud of.  Of course, I could have gone on winning streak and won tons of money that night. But, that misses the point.

As a serious stock trader, and a serious poker player, you are constantly trying to fight and minimize the luck that is involved, not embrace it. Luck is the ephemeral friend of amateurs.  If you find yourself in exceptionally volatile situations, of course you can gamble it up all you want. But that’s not the risk/reward profile you should be looking for as a serious trader.

———————————————————————————-

In the current stock market in which we reside, many traders are disrespecting the short term luck involved.  Perhaps buying falling knives right now like $RIG, $BP and $APC will show a huge profit over the long run.  However, what usually happens is traders try to precisely time an inflection point, only to lose a quick 20% and sell out of their positions.  They sell out of both frustration of quickly losing money, and fear that their doomed stock will soon go to $0.

My point is that you always need to have an exit strategy in mind for any position that you take. Even if you do not place a specific stop loss, you should mentally have a price target in mind where you are explicitly prepared to admit that you are wrong and have made a mistake.  Note that this applies to long term investors as well, even if they had previously averaged down in a position.  At some point, you will be wrong.  Limiting further downside risk is an ever present issue in the stock market, if you want to live to fight another day.

Take, for example, the bulls who bought last Thursday’s 3% rally. We have now closed below where we were before that day started. Are they going to admit they were wrong if we keep seeing more selling? Each and every rally attempt we are seeing is being met with distribution.  I am going to respect that fact and, despite any oversold conditions, will sit in cash for now until I see a better environment to trade.

Comments »

The World is Ending

Just over twenty years ago, the United States of America was in the midst of enjoying the prosperity of an epic secular bull market, defeating tyrannical governments around the world, and celebrating young Mike Tyson’s rapid ascent as one of the most dominating heavyweight boxers that the world had ever seen.

Fast forward to 2010 and, well, have a look for yourself at what kind of pussified country we really have become….(“Earl Grey sucks”…Good Lord)

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5XFH36UdQ4&feature=player_embedded#! 450 300]

Comments »

The Crash That Never Was

After the “flash crash” on May 6th of this year, many people went out of their way to argue that the intraday melt down was an aberration of sorts.  They implored traders to disregard the massive, high volume 10% spike down that day as something that “does not count.” Even some of the most esteemed technicians, like Louise Yamada, went on television and told traders that if they doubted the validity of the 1065 print on the $SPX, they could simply put their hand over that gap on the chart as though it never occurred. Other traders simply laughed off the event as being a mere game of chicken between Wall Street and Washington, D.C.. They argued that the bull market would continue to march on, going forward from that day.

The problem with those kinds of arguments is that only price gets paid in the stock market.  Unless you engaged in one of the few trades that got cancelled on May 6th, everything else was, and is, completely valid.  Why? Because the market is the ultimate and final arbiter.  To trivialize any price action in the market is reckless and unprofessional.  The market has been telling us for quite some time now that it is sick and unhealthy.  Moreover, that 1065 flash crash low is acting as a price magnet.  Take a step back and ask yourself, with so many people doubting the actual validity of that price, is it possible for us NOT to test it again?

Regardless of your theory about what happened two weeks ago, however, the bottom line for traders is that the demand for equities is being overwhelmed by supply.  Ever since mid April, the charts of both the broad indices and the leading stocks have been telling you to cut your longs.  Price swings, volatility and selling volume picked up well before the “masters of the universe” allegedly turned off the computers on that infamous day.

As I am writing this,  I see that we are off of the lows of the session.  However, we have blasted down through the key 200 day moving average and have spent the entire day below there.  The bulls are running out of time, and even the most steadfast ones who continue to harp on the “May 6th crash that never was” are learning the hard way to always respect Mr. Market, in spite of his temper tantrums.

Comments »