Joined Apr 1, 2010
8,861 Blog Posts
© Copyright 2007-2024 iBankCoin All rights reserved under penalty of bodily harm. DISCLAIMER: This is a personal web site, reflecting the opinions of its author(s). It is not a production of my employer, and it is unaffiliated with any FINRA broker/dealer. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of anyone other than myself. The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes only, and are not investing recommendations. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities. DATA INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO THE USERS "AS IS." NEITHER iBankCoin, NOR ITS AFFILIATES, NOR ANY THIRD PARTY DATA PROVIDER MAKE ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND REGARDING THE DATA INFORMATION, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. Privacy Policy
ha, looks like him
Looks like Declan, too, in that scene, haha.
One has to wonder what this news flow does to folks at Intel who are still trying to sell and manage the McAfee line of products. It seems the name is tainted like the plague.
Even though his product is sound and his influence long gone, what if you managed an IT system what are you going with McAfee or a competitor?
If you buy a new device that comes with packaged security choices are you going with
McAfee or Symantec?
Which brings up $AVG check it out new agreements with Yahoo and Google. Stock is up 0.90 today on Yahoo news.
Over the long run, Intel bought McAfee to incorporate security in firmware on their processors, not to sell competitive products to Symantec. If they can pull it off, the name won’t matter. That’s assuming they don’t lose hardware share first.